Changes in visual quality associated with the use of Biofinity Energys contact lenses

Abstract

Biofinity EnergysTM contact lenses (CLs) incorporate the Digital Zone OpticsTM design, which has been developed to manage computer visual syndrome (CVI). The objective of the present study is to compare contrast sensitivity (CS) and optical aberrations induced during wear of Biofinity® and Biofinity EnergysTM LCs. A total of 14 subjects attended a single visit in which they were fitted with two LCs at random without the subject or the evaluator being aware of the lens under study. Visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS), monocular and binocular, were assessed. In addition, ocular aberrometry was analyzed and the adaptation of each LC was tested. As results, no significant differences were seen in the adaptation of the LCs. Monocular and binocular VA was lower during wearing the Biofinity EnergysTM LCs (p = 0.002 and p = 0.045, respectively). Monocular CS was found to be decreased for the frequency of 18 cycles per degree during wearing the Biofinity EnergysTM LCs (p = 0.008). However, binocularly, only a trend to decreased frequency of 3 cycles per degree was found with the same LCs (p = 0.06). The magnitude of optical aberrations increased for oblique tetrafoil (Z-4 4) (p = 0.022) and secondary astigmatism (Z2 4) (p = 0.002) with Biofinity EnergysTM LCs. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Digital Zone OpticsTM design of Biofinity EnergysTM LCs induces certain higher order aberrations, which could explain the consequent decrease in VA and SC.
PDF (Spanish)

References

Colegio Oficial de Ópticos Optometristas de Cataluña (COOC). Campaña “Visión y pantallas”. ¿Qué es el SVI (Síndrome Visual Informático)? Disponible en: http://www.victor3d.cat/pantalles/quees.html

American Optometric Association. Computer vision syndrome. Disponible en: https://www.aoa.org/healthy-eyes/eye-and-vision-conditions/computer-vision-syndrome?sso=y

Blehm C, Vishnu S, Khattak A, Mitra S, Yee RW. Computer Vision Syndrome: A Review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50(3): 253-262. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.02.008

Pritchard N, Fonn D, Brazeau D. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: a survey. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1999;26(6): 157-162. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-8967(01)00040-2

Cooper Vision. Biofinity Energys. Disponible en: http://coopervision.es/our-company/news-center/press-release/biofinity-energys

Pérez-Prados, Piñero DP, Pérez-Cambrodí, Madrid-Costa D. Soft multifocal simultaneous image contact lenses: a review. Clin Exp Optom. 2017;100(2): 107–127. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12488

Gifford P, Cannon T, Lee C, Lee D, Lee HF, Swarbrick HA. Ocular aberrations and visual function with multifocal versus single vision soft contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013;36: 66-73

Valencia-Nieto L, Arlanzón-Lope P, Arroyo-Del Arroyo C, López-De la Rosa Alberto, González-García MJ. Efecto de las lentes de contacto con diseño Digital Zone OpticsTM en la sintomatología, visión y variables clínicas en usuarios de lentes de contacto. Gaceta de Optometría y Óptica Oftálmica. 2020;556: 54-58

Ophthalmic optics. Contact lenses and contact lens care products. Guidance for clinical investigations. ISO 2010. 11980; 2010

Olarte RV. Entendiendo e interpretando las aberraciones ópticas. Cien Tecnol Salud Vis Ocul. 2011;9(2): 105-22.

Báez, MV. Exámenes de topografía, aberrometría y pentacámara. Revista de la Federación Colombiana de Optómetras. 2008;22: 22-26

Keywords

myopia
prevalence
America
meta-analysis
review